Scribus uses less resources and supports multipage documents. a good raster photo editor with non-destructive editing capabilities I've also had issues with the cage transform in Gimp, but it's fixed now, so if you're on Ubuntu, just add a PPA with the latest version of Gimp. I think Darktable does non-desctructive editing but I haven't used it myself. > Gimp and Inkscape are both extremely sub-par apps. Paint.NET beats Gimp in usability, Photoshop in both features and stability. I think it's a bit sad to be whinging at those good pieces of free software for lacking features, and just recommend proprietary software instead. Surely, it is also the developers of the proprietary software that are causing this lack of features by not sharing their code for those. What are those features missing in Gimp? (Gimp does have CMYK editing, if you install the gimp-plugin-registry package.) It also suggests you are willing to give up your freedom for a few extra features. Those non-free programs you mentioned can probably be run with Wine on GNU/Linux. TL DR: A program needs either (a) features + good UX/I or (b) rock-solid stability + amazing performance characteristics to compensate for anything else lacking. > give up your freedom for a few extra features Gimp has neither, it's some kind of "middle ground" thingy that annoys everyone. Not really, I use like 10% max of Photoshop's features I guess. But those features simply feel perfectly implemented, they just f work. Heck, I even use it for vector graphics sometimes because it "just works" and feels more natural than Illustrator.Īnd I'm not just used to PS. I actually liked Corel Photoshop more back in the day.Īnd Inkscape has the same natural/intuitive feel to it after you use it a bit. Starts to crack once the complexity grows, but for starter it just works. Blender has a learning curve, but afterwards it also feels "natural" and "well built". However, there are two main types of images: There are many image creation and manipulation software programs.You get used to it, but boy it's weird), keyboard shortcuts don't work in all contexts (sometimes it feels like they randomly stop working) and (3) there's no easy way to reversibly do things like ad an adjustment/effect layer, turn effect on and of on a layer or some groups from the layers panel etc.Įverything: (1) performance feels horrible, like doing everything in slow mo compared to anything else (2) UI feels very inconsistent and has very weird concepts about the relationship between layers and selections and stuff like that (like "wtf is a 'floating selection' thingy doing in my layers panel?. Raster or bitmap images are a majority of the digital images you generally encounter. Raster images are the default output of everything from digital cameras to most graphics editing software like Paint or Paintbrush.Ĭommon examples are JPG, PNG, GIF, TIFF or BMP. They are made up of pixels, which is to say a grid of colored rectangular dots. The advantage of raster graphics is that at high resolutions (lots of pixels in a small area) you can have very fine control over color and shape raster images can contain millions of colors and look very realistic. However, the major downside to raster images is that the more the images are manipulated after creation, the more the quality declines. For instance, if you create your image at one size, making it bigger can create jagged-looking edges (“pixelation”), while shrinking it can lead to colors and shapes blurring into each other. Vector images are created with vector graphics software (like Inkscape). While Inkscape uses an internationally standardized format for two-dimensional vector graphics (SVG), many other, sometimes proprietary, file formats for vector graphics and their various applications (fonts, CAD, cartography, 3D modeling …) exist. Instead of being made of dots, vector images are made of mathematically-defined lines and curves. Lines in a vector graphic can also be joined together to form larger objects, each of which can be given their own style (colors, patterns, etc.).īecause all of the elements of the vector image are defined by mathematical formulae and not by a grid of dots as in a raster image, sharpness is maintained regardless of how much the image is enlarged. However large or small you make it, the curves are simply recalculated and redrawn, without losing quality.Īs a result, a single vector image can be used for different sizes of the final image presentation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |